Multiple Wikipedia editors engaged in revision disputes over the 2026 United States Senate election in Michigan article, disagreeing over endorsement sourcing standards and campaign finance detail levels. Editors reverted each other's changes multiple times over content inclusion and independent source requirements.
13 reports · 10 independentother
Claim audit
No BS check run yet — press ⚖ to extract this story's claims and verify them against independent sources.
Dcpoliticaljunkie: → Endorsements : Per WP:ENDORSE , we only include endorsements covered by reliable sources (other than the organization's own site) and they need to be explicitly described as "endorsements". Most of these probably have coverage, but removing until they are tracked down.
MAWJ The Awesome: Article had too much needless detail about finances, which was irrelevant, to the focus of the article and took up a paragraph and a half. Got rid of all needless information, including exact statistics of fundraising, which once again violates {{WP:RECENT}}. Per talk page added back the word moderate, which has been unjustly removed. Added back sentence about Rogers preferring t
MAWJ The Awesome: Summed up info while getting rid of filler per talk section discussion. I greatly condensed the finance section as it was not that relevant to the current campaign. Fixed clunky wording with quotes and clarified meaning to a couple of sentences.
Klbrain: AfD-merge from Controversies of the 2006 United States Senate election in Virginia ; see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Controversies of the 2006 United States Senate election in Virginia