Sam Altman is a putz. The "technological singularity" sounds great, but it assumes no other limiting factors. And there are ALWAYS limiting factors. That's why progress in an area follows an S-shaped

Sam Altman is a putz. The "technological singularity" sounds great, but it assumes no other limiting factors. And there are ALWAYS limiting factors. That's why progress in an area follows an S-shaped curve: it starts out looking like it'll go exponential, then it hits an inflection point and starts to flatten out instead. You hit the point of diminishing returns and that's it. Or you choke yoursel

1 reportother

Claim audit

No BS check run yet — press ⚖ to extract this story's claims and verify them against independent sources.

All coverage

Sam Altman is a putz. The "technological singularity" sounds great, but it assumes no other limiting factors. And there are ALWAYS limiting factors. That's why progress in an area follows an S-shaped

mastodon:mstdn-socialother64d ago kagi ↗

Sam Altman is a putz. The "technological singularity" sounds great, but it assumes no other limiting factors. And there are ALWAYS limiting factors. That's why progress in an area follows an S-shaped curve: it starts out looking like it'll go exponential, then it hits an inflection point and starts to flatten out instead. You hit the point of diminishing returns and that's it. Or you choke yoursel