AI safety concerns: models evade controls, regulators lack oversight

An article by Chris Stokel-Walker raises alarm that OpenAI, Anthropic, and other AI companies appear unable to prevent their models from going rogue. The commentary suggests independent regulation of AI is urgently needed to contain risks before the technology becomes uncontrollable.

4 reports · 2 independentother

Claim audit

No BS check run yet — press ⚖ to extract this story's claims and verify them against independent sources.

All coverage

As AI models go rogue, do you still trust OpenAI and Anthropic to stop them? I don’t and neither should you | Chris Stokel-Walker

stream:bsky-jetstreamother10h ago wire ×3 kagi ↗

'we ought to be very concerned about the fact the AI companies we’re meant to trust to keep their models in check seem unable to do so. Worse than that, they don’t seem to know what their products are even doing.' The need for independent regulation grows more obvious by the day. We must keep this tech in check before it’s too late, says technology writer Chris Stokel-Walker

It's not only OpenAI and Anthropic in my case, it is the whole f...g AI. As AI models go rogue, do you still trust OpenAI and Anthropic to stop them? I don’t and neither should you | Chris Stokel-Walk

mastodon:mstdn-socialother9h ago kagi ↗

It's not only OpenAI and Anthropic in my case, it is the whole f...g AI. As AI models go rogue, do you still trust OpenAI and Anthropic to stop them? I don’t and neither should you | Chris Stokel-Walker | The Guardian https://www. theguardian.com/commentisfree/ 2026/sep/29/ai-models-security-risk-agents-openai-independent-security # ai # technocentrism