An interesting argument applying Daniel Dennett’s idea of mental stances to LLMs. https://www. newyorker.com/culture/open-que stions/can-ai-go-rogue We take three stances toward other people: ⁃ intent

An interesting argument applying Daniel Dennett’s idea of mental stances to LLMs. https://www. newyorker.com/culture/open-que stions/can-ai-go-rogue We take three stances toward other people: ⁃ intentional stance: they have beliefs and goals that they’re acting on. ⁃ design stance: they’re acting that way because that’s the way people act. (“She’s talking to him because she’s extroverted.” ) (1/5)

1 social postother

Claim audit

No BS check run yet — press ⚖ to extract this story's claims and verify them against independent sources.

All coverage

An interesting argument applying Daniel Dennett’s idea of mental stances to LLMs. https://www. newyorker.com/culture/open-que stions/can-ai-go-rogue We take three stances toward other people: ⁃ intent

mastodon:mstdn-socialother18d ago kagi ↗

An interesting argument applying Daniel Dennett’s idea of mental stances to LLMs. https://www. newyorker.com/culture/open-que stions/can-ai-go-rogue We take three stances toward other people: ⁃ intentional stance: they have beliefs and goals that they’re acting on. ⁃ design stance: they’re acting that way because that’s the way people act. (“She’s talking to him because she’s extroverted.” ) (1/5)