The choice of Swift may sound as an inherent backpack coming from the iOS app, but this agent was written initially in C, then in Go.. (yeah i wrote some other agents in typescript and holyc too) and

The choice of Swift may sound as an inherent backpack coming from the iOS app, but this agent was written initially in C, then in Go.. (yeah i wrote some other agents in typescript and holyc too) and with all the experience adquired, Swift provided the best synchronization primitives to achieve a much more solid experience. Imho not depending on nodejs or python and just dropping a single statical

1 reportother

Claim audit

No BS check run yet — press ⚖ to extract this story's claims and verify them against independent sources.

All coverage

The choice of Swift may sound as an inherent backpack coming from the iOS app, but this agent was written initially in C, then in Go.. (yeah i wrote some other agents in typescript and holyc too) and

mastodon:infosec-exchangeother22d ago kagi ↗

The choice of Swift may sound as an inherent backpack coming from the iOS app, but this agent was written initially in C, then in Go.. (yeah i wrote some other agents in typescript and holyc too) and with all the experience adquired, Swift provided the best synchronization primitives to achieve a much more solid experience. Imho not depending on nodejs or python and just dropping a single statical