People are so annoyed by the # Debian LLM usage vote, not just because the vote passed democratically and they didn’t like it, but because it did not. The vote was rigged, requiring a disproportional

People are so annoyed by the # Debian LLM usage vote, not just because the vote passed democratically and they didn’t like it, but because it did not. The vote was rigged, requiring a disproportional majority for only ONE (1) of the poll options, which was the outright rejection of Al contributions. Think about that. Rejecting LLM usage required a 3:1, and for any other option, just a majority. Bu

1 reportother

Claim audit

No BS check run yet — press ⚖ to extract this story's claims and verify them against independent sources.

All coverage

People are so annoyed by the # Debian LLM usage vote, not just because the vote passed democratically and they didn’t like it, but because it did not. The vote was rigged, requiring a disproportional

mastodon:infosec-exchangeother30d ago kagi ↗

People are so annoyed by the # Debian LLM usage vote, not just because the vote passed democratically and they didn’t like it, but because it did not. The vote was rigged, requiring a disproportional majority for only ONE (1) of the poll options, which was the outright rejection of Al contributions. Think about that. Rejecting LLM usage required a 3:1, and for any other option, just a majority. Bu