I'm beyond baffled to read this. "Responsible" use of AI, implies the existence of irresponsible use of AI, which at no point whatsoever, should be considered a valid option for a project the size of

I'm beyond baffled to read this. "Responsible" use of AI, implies the existence of irresponsible use of AI, which at no point whatsoever, should be considered a valid option for a project the size of Debian but also for ANY project that is meant to be used by anyone other than the author. You absolutely CANNOT submit contributions and say "oh this isn't me, I let the bot do it", this is not a thin

1 reportother

Claim audit

No BS check run yet — press ⚖ to extract this story's claims and verify them against independent sources.

All coverage

I'm beyond baffled to read this. "Responsible" use of AI, implies the existence of irresponsible use of AI, which at no point whatsoever, should be considered a valid option for a project the size of

mastodon:fosstodonother31d ago kagi ↗

I'm beyond baffled to read this. "Responsible" use of AI, implies the existence of irresponsible use of AI, which at no point whatsoever, should be considered a valid option for a project the size of Debian but also for ANY project that is meant to be used by anyone other than the author. You absolutely CANNOT submit contributions and say "oh this isn't me, I let the bot do it", this is not a thin