Given Debian's decision on AI and LLM usage, perhaps something like: [X-]AI-Usage: none | optional | required [X-]AI-Dependency: none | local | external [X-]AI-Assisted: none | packaging | source

Given Debian's decision on AI and LLM usage, perhaps something like: [X-]AI-Usage: none | optional | required [X-]AI-Dependency: none | local | external [X-]AI-Assisted: none | packaging | source | documentation | ... in the control file would be a goer? Would at least encourage transparency and user choice for those of us that care. I wonder if that would be consistent with the resolution as vote

1 social postother

Given Debian's decision on AI and LLM usage, perhaps something like: [X-]AI-Usage: none | optional | required [X-]AI-Dependency: none | local | external [X-]AI-Assisted: none | packaging | source | do

mastodon:infosec-exchangeother31d ago kagi ↗

Given Debian's decision on AI and LLM usage, perhaps something like: [X-]AI-Usage: none | optional | required [X-]AI-Dependency: none | local | external [X-]AI-Assisted: none | packaging | source | do

Claim audit

All coverage

Given Debian's decision on AI and LLM usage, perhaps something like: [X-]AI-Usage: none | optional | required [X-]AI-Dependency: none | local | external [X-]AI-Assisted: none | packaging | source | do